How do we explain a decrease in 20M votes between the presidential race of 2020 to 2024?
There was a 26M vote increase in the 2020 presidential election compared to 2016. There was a 22M vote decrease in 2024 compared to the 2020 election. So where did the 20M votes go?
Answers published on the internet:
FACT FOCUS: A multimillion vote gap between 2020 and 2024 fuels false election narratives: “>>>proving either that Trump has cheated his way to a second term or that there was widespread fraud four years ago…Claims of widespread fraud in 2020 have been debunked countless times…Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Director Jen Easterly said in a statement. “This is what we saw yesterday in the peaceful and secure exercise of democracy. Importantly, we have no evidence of any malicious activity that had a material impact on the security or integrity of our election infrastructure.”
This article goes on to quote Gov Shapiro who said reports that there was “massive cheating” in Philadelphia are false.
The USA CN editorial board believes that expert opinion and data they cite supports the position that significant election fraud in the November 2024 and previous elections have occurred. The balance of this editorial will describe a snapshot of that evidence.
Software used by Democrat and Republican Election consultants
Greg Phillips from TruetheVote correctly predicted that new software that the Republican party was using for the first time was competitive with the software used by Attorney Mark Elias for the Democrats in a recent interview. He correctly predicted that President Trump would win the election partly because of the effectives of this software in helping the get out to vote and identifying abnormal voting data..
So why are so many down ballot races in many of the swing states that President Trump won losing or still being counted?
Arizona election races: Kari Lake
In the article, 2024: How to Out-Compute the Left, Jay Valentine presents evidence as to how Kari Lake lost her governor’s race in 2022 and how she will probably lose her senate race in 2024.
“”Jay Valentine led the team that built the eBay fraud detection engine and the TSA No-Fly List. Jay’s team built the world’s largest election database with Fractal tech and developed the Undeliverable Ballot Database. Jay can be contacted at https://Omega4America.com and @AmericaOme17300.”
Jay Valentine commented, in an interview with Steve Bannon, 2024 Election – How To Out Compute The Left, that his group, using the Fractal software, had high quality legal evidence that Kari Lake’s governor race in 2022 was stolen by her opponent.
The following is a paraphrasing of Jay Valentine’s comments during the interview.
Kari Lake’s attorney, Kurt Olsen, decided to leave out of the trial that Fractal software evidence from the 2022 Lake vs Hobbs Governor’s race because he felt it was a new type of computer science software evidence that may be hard for the judge to evaluate. So he went with the signature evidence, which Jay said was very strong legal evidence, in his non lawyer’s opinion. And yet, the judge rejected the signature evidence.
The AI based software can identify, in detail, the name, address, zip code etc. of each voter on the voter registry database. The software can, also, record how voter rolls change shortly before, and, shortly after an election. They can show changes in zip codes of individual voters before the election and then those changed codes returning to the original zip code shortly after the election. In other words, individual canvassing of a voter can prove that the voter did not move to that zip code. In addition, a large number of voters zip codes changing within a county and then returning back to the same zip code just before or after an election is prima facie evidence for a plaintiff to convince a judge to allow the case to go to trial to further assess that evidence.
Jay Valentine’s group found 33,000 voters in one county had their zip codes changed one week before the MIBs were mailed out, and, then, they were changed back. Those people did not know that they did not get a ballot because they got the rest of their mail, The postal service did not change their zip code, the election commission did.
22,000 new voters were added to the voter rolls. Most were added after the cut off date of October 11 for making changes to the voter database. Therefore those voters according to the state law were illegal votes which. Hobbs had an approximate 17,000 vote advantage. Kari Lake did not know that change had occurred, but, the leftists did know that these new voters were illegal because they were added after the deadline that changes to the voter data base could be made, October 11.
In Az, MIB recipients had their zip codes changed, as demonstrated by Jay Valentines software, making a copy of the Az voter registration, 30 days before Kari lakes Governor’s race, and, then, another copy was made 96 hours before the election and they compared them.
Unfortunately, Jay reports that the same vote manipulation is happening in the current Az race for the senate and other races (Appendix).
JUST IN: One Day After 2024 Election, Arizona Supreme Court Rejects Kari Lake’s Lawsuit to Overturn Stolen 2022 Election by Jordan Conradson Nov. 9, 2024 11:40 am: will kari Lake’s team appeal it to the Federal Supreme Court?
THE FIX IS IN: Maricopa County Releases Another Bogus 97K Ballot Dump as They Steal Kari Lake’s Race by Jordan Conradson Nov. 11, 2024 8:00 am: “Maricopa County would have you believe that 100,000 people voted Donald Trump for President and an open borders Marxist for the Senate…The ballot counting is still not over, but it’s not looking great.”
USA CN editorial board goes into this level of detail with Kari Lake’s case in order to show you the high quality of legal evidence of voter fraud that the judges adjudicating this type and other types of election fraud evidence described in this and previous USA CN Editorials are not acknowledging the legitimacy that these types of evidence gives to a plaintiff’s case and warrants a judicial decision in favor of the plaintiff.
Az GOP attorneys who litigated Az Republican candidates election fraud cases in 2020 and 2022 according to NBC, these ” Arizona lawyers keep distance from GOP’s ‘election integrity’ operation amid concern over Kari Lake’s fraud claims”.
The USA CN editorial board asks why is the evidence of the zip code changes, the signature evidence on MIBs, and expert opinion like that of Attorneys Favorito and Curtis, at a minimum, adequate evidence to justify past and current Az and other states election outcome/fraud litigation?
In a Gateway Pundit article published Nov 7, 2024, Kari Lake is Coming Back in Close Arizona Senate Race with Roughly 70% of Votes Counted — Race Remains Too Close to Call, the Journalist, Conradson, said that “Somehow, Ruben Gallego even had more votes than President Trump at the time, leading some to question the integrity of the vote count. …It is possible that some voters split their ticket and voted for Trump and Gallego, but does anyone believe that tens of thousands of voters picked Trump and a radical left Democrat for Senate?
USA CN editorial boards asks, again, is there no legal action Republican lawyers can take given the high quality evidence such as the zip codes changed and then returned back to their original zip codes described by Jay Valentine?
Did the Olsen legal team exhaust its appeals regarding signature verification to the Az and Federal supreme court?signature evidence described by Jay Valentine as high quality in Kari Lake’s governor’s race case but rejected by the judge?
“Chief Judge Kent E. Cattani delivered the opinion of the Court,” “The Arizona Supreme Court has declined to hear Republican Kari Lake’s latest appeal over her defeat in the 2022 governor’s race”: “…her request for relief fails because the evidence presented to the superior court ultimately supports the court’s conclusion that voters were able to cast their ballots, that votes were counted correctly, and that no other basis justifies setting aside the election results. Accordingly, we affirm.”
The staff of FindLaw interpreted the Judges decion to be based on that “Arizona law recognizes only limited grounds to contest election results for state office.
The USA CN Editorial board highlights just one criteria that the judge used in this case to rule in favor of the defense: : “that votes were counted correctly”. That ruling was not consistent with evidence put forth by forensic computer science/legal experts like Garland Favorito and Clint Curtis, for at least 20 years, that any election that counts the vote using electronic voting machines can not be adjudicated to be prima facie evidence that the machine tabulation count is correct. Their expert opinion, given under oath, describes how malware can be inserted into these machines to flip or fractionate votes without detection. How this testimony repeated by these two experts repeatedly in court, under oath, and in many publications, most recently during interviews by USA CN has not be recognized by a Judge and not presented by each and every plaintiff’s attorney is a sign that the legal system needs major reform. And, that the legal system is allowing the vote counters and not the voters to choose the elected officials who spend tax payer money in a manner that is bankrupting this Republic.
Wisconsin election races: Hovde concedes despite evidence of vote manipulation
In the article, Election Theft Attempt Thwarted in Milwaukee After Seals on 13 Tabulators Were Broken, Wisconsin Congressional races were described as having “computer glitches”; Republican Senate candidate, Hovde, loses lead to Democrat leftist Senator Baldwin: “A 4AM ballot drop takes Hovde from a 4% lead to a 1% loss.
Are we going to have a real investigation this time?”
Given Jay Valentine’s interview descriptions of high quality legal evidence in multiple states such as Wisconsin and Arizona for example, why did Republican candidate for Wisconsin senate race concede?
USA CN Editorial board asks the same question. This pattern has occurred in previous races with good legal evidence defining the criteria needed to classify as good quality evidence and with Jay Valentine’s group’s fractal software, why can not there be imaging of the voter rolls before and after points as described in the Kari Lake case? And, why can’t the large vote insertion at 4AM be examined?
Elections laws need to be changed: Attorney Clint Curtis
And if the answer is that the evidence does not meet the legal criteria, then we quote Florida Democrat attorney, Clint Curtis . And he said that election laws have been written by politicians who also purchased the electronic voting machine software. The laws are written to make it difficult to decertify an election and other nuanced legal regulations that, in essence, allow elections to be stolen.
He advocates that state legislatures must revise these laws so that they recognize adequate quality of legal evidence so election fraud can be stopped. USA CN Editorial board strongly supports Attorney, Clint Curtis’s advocacy.
Republican lawyers suppressing evidence of Democrat voter fraud against Republican candidates
“Lt Col Tony Shaffer (retired), a New York Times bestselling author, and CIA trained intelligence operations officer with 35 years of experience in global and national security”, describes a Republican coverup of enough illegal MIBs in Pa identified after the 2020 election to have decertified the presidential election in Pa. The evidence was suppressed by Republican attorneys and law enforcement.
There have been other cases in which evidence of various levels of quality suggest or indicate that Republican lawyers have suppressed evidence of voter fraud against their own Republican candidates.
Given Jay Valentine’s analysis, as well as other evidence, described in this editorial, and, in other digital media publications, like “X” and the Gateway Pundit, we ask the question, are some Republican officials, legal and elected, working as a “uni party with some Democrats, to “steal” elections for Democrats.
The purpose of the “steal” would possibly be to prevent Republican control of the House of Representatives and, thereby, prevent the Republicans from using the power of the purse to ensure Trump domination of new policy and laws. And limit control of the senate by Republican Senators to not neutralize the anti Trump Republican senate vote?
Given this evidence of past and current election fraud, How did President Trump win in 2024?
Attorney David Clements: increased Republican and decreased Democrat voter turnout in 2024
USA CN editorial board recommends the analysis of how President Trump won in 2024 but not in 2020 by New Mexico Republican attorney, David Clements, whose recent political advocacy can be viewed on his website: The Professor’s Record with David K. Clements .
Attorney David Clements (DC) says that prior to 2020, there was no difference between Democrat and Republican use of MIBs . In 2020, President Trump did not recommend using them and in 2024 he did. Democrats supported the use of MIBs in both elections.
DC states that MIB advocates were able to influence states to introduce regulations that the MIBs were not to have those votes counted until after election day. That delay, he implies, and, other evidence from other media publications, suggested that the delay in tabulating the MIB vote allowed the Democrats to figure out how many more votes Biden needed to beat Trump. And, that explains why Biden had a 22M additional vote in 2020 compared to 2024.
In 2024, Trump recommended the “too big to rig” MIB protocol. The Republican turnout for MIBs in 2024 exceeded that of the Democrats in 2020. And, the “Democrats did not counter with a get out the vote on election day for Democrats”. So, “at this point, it wasn’t so much about whether or not the Democrats could use the rigged infrastructure to generate fake ballots. Their problem was no one would believe it, based on the data that was coming in real time…”
“X” as an alternative medium for Republicans, endorsements by former Democrats RFK,JR and T. Gabbard and popular podcaster J Rogan, and the disappearance of 300,000 immigrant children
Other factors were that “Elon Musk bought Twitter, now called X, “…and he created an alternative medium that could not be suppressed…Another “narrative busting” event were the endorsements by joe Rogan, RFK, JR, Tulsi Gabbard and Elon Musk…Add to these events, the fact that “…300,000…immigrant children have disappeared…” under the Biden-Harris administration. “.
DC goes on to say that “…we were prepped for this idea that we’re going to be counting ballots 10 11 and 12 days after the election day…” But as soon as “…we broke their narrative all of a sudden…we overwhelmed the rig…[but] there are many down ballot races that were stolen [in 2024]…”
Electronic voting machines can flip or fractionate votes and existing laws prevent detection: Attorneys Favorito and Curtis
In addition to fractal software changing zip codes, MIB manipulation, election day tabulating machine intentional dysfunction, there are the ability of electronic voting machines to manipulate votes from both MIBs and election day voting as explained by Georgia attorney, Garland Favorito and Florida attorney, Clint Curtis.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the fractal software appears to have given the Republicans a powerful tool to identify various subgrouops of voters who are legal and illegal voters. The data identified by this AI based software is prima facie evidence of illegally and legally registered voters.
According to Attorney David Clements, the much higher Republican turnout and decreased turnout of Democrat voters in the 2024 election compared to the 2020 election did have a “too big to rig” impact on the Democrats that made it harder to hide illegal votes.
The expert opinions of Georgia Constitutional party attorney, Garland Favorito, and Florida Democrat Attorney, Clint Curtis, who both were computer scientists and IT programmers before becoming attorneys, agree that electronic voting machines can have malware inserted in an undetectable way and this malware can only be identified with imaging of the entire computer that is contractually not allowed by the companies that sell these machines to the same politicians that write the election laws that make it difficult to prove machine based fraud.
They recommend banning electronic voting machines, use only paper ballots that are hand counted in small precincts with small volunteer teams and limit the use of MIBs.
Can we trust the electronic voting machines that just took 24 more hours to count a senate vote between Baldwin and Hovde that had a fraction of the votes that were processed by the same electronic machines that processed the larger vote for President 24 hours sooner?
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Appendix
CSE helped win the 2024 Election!
‘Ninety percent of current election fraud comes in two buckets: election commissions jacking with voter rolls like Arizona and Wisconsin and mail-in ballots collected and illegally voted like everywhere.
Neither fraud bucket is thwarted by organizational solutions — both can be stopped with real-time compute power.” This AI based software makes the same predication regarding the Wisconsin race that Eric Hovde just lost
Broken seals on all 13 tabulators and voter registration violations add to this evidence in the Wisconsin senate race.
Why Kari Lake Lost 2022 and May Again In 2024
How Fractal Finds Illegal Alien Ballot Mills – Nevada
2024 Election – How To Out Compute The Left
OAN: “Phantom Voters” Registered In Key Swing States Could Cost Trump The 2024 Elections
https://x.com/_CitizenAG/status/1851611423949959668
The team found over 30,000 Georgia voters with multiple voter ID numbers
Former computer scientist, IT programmer, whistleblower and Democrat attorney, Clint Curtis, describes a simple plan that can stop election fraud.
Attorney Clint Curtis 00:31:44:11 00:32:04:11 You look at it. How big is a precinct? Because that’s where you count. It’s so you don’t need 25 million people to count that precinct. You need 5 or 6, and you’re done. And it’s under camera. So, they can’t cheat because everybody can watch it happen. So, if you look at the video, you’ll see that. So, I’ve been trying to get that on in Dallas.
Where did those +20M voters go? The truth was they never existed. Biden cheated.
The seals were discovered broken on multiple tabulator machines this afternoon at Milwaukee’s Central Count, resulting in Milwaukee having to zero out and recount tens of thousands of absentee ballots, Milwaukee GOP Chairman Hilario Deleon and GOP Election Observer Jefferson Davis told WRN.
TWO TEXAS congressional RACES republicans LOSE THE LEAD
In Harris county Texas, two Republican congressional candidates saw their leading vote counts disappear. in Harris county, there are now huge discrepancies in early voters by polling location between yesterday and what is now showing today. these should not change, yet 60 polling location…
— Caroline Kane for Congress (@CarolineKaneTX) November 4, 2024
Joseph L. Trahan, a candidate for Senate District 15, took to social media platform X to air his grievances.
Wednesday Oct 30 at HCC 610 loop easily 2,500 voters entered that voting center by all accounts and this morning Harris County Central Count adjusted that number to 711?
_______________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
See the Op yet, people?
This week, we should & ARE celebrating the fact that Donald Trump has emphatically proven he has the mandate of the American people.
But NOT because we currently have free & fair elections.
Pay attention to enemy programming, and you see what it fears.
_______________________________________________
Peter Bernegger, [11/5/2024 4:38 PM]
ATTENTION America we need your help! New election clerk Paulina Gutierrez is slow walking the election right now at Central Count in the City of Milwaukee.
We need you all to contact her office and demand she get to work and speed up the election – here’s why:
-paid workers are milling around, ballots are stacked up, but only 4 of the 13 tabulators are being fed ballots at any given time; sometimes no tabulators are running!!
-announcement was just made they expect to be counting ballots till 2-3am Nov.6th…but tons of workers milling around doing nothing
-Paulina has NOT been seen at Central Count at all
-Lots of “skinny” ballots
-Wis. Election Commissioner Ann Jacobs is sitting on the floor at Central Count, which is being held this year at the Baird Convention Center downtown Milwaukee, she is doing NOTHING to move things along
-Ballots are coming in from the wrong wards
-Many ballots, they say, have to be remade!
-State law permits opening and tabulating the ballots beginning at 7am; at 8:30am they still were not doing so; they began at 9:38am!!!! Unbelievable.
-Contact the City of Milwaukee Election Commission at Room 501 City Hall and demand Paulina get the election going!!!! HELP us, call them, email them.
Be polite but firm. Where are you Rep Scott Krug, Senator Dan Knodl, Bryan Steil?
~ Peter Bernegger (https://t.me/PeterBernegger)
Peter Bernegger, [11/5/2024 8:29 PM]
Seals broken on ALL 13 tabulators at Milwaukee Center Count! Claim: door was not closed properly, yeah right…on all 13 tabulators?
HUGE questions abound: Jenna Rae of TMJ4 News said they began counting mail-in ballots at 8:45am. What? State law permits ballot processing to begin at 7am. Second source said they began at 8:39am.
What is going on Paulina Gutierrez? She is the city election clerk, and she is a disaster! #Milwaukee What say you Mayor Cavalier Johnson?
TMJ4 News says from 8:45am until 4:45pm they only ran 31,000 through the 13 tabulators. What the heck?
They have many high speed tabulators, the DS950 model runs 280 ballots per minute (and yes have to account for feeding in times, etc., but still).
31,000 divided by 280/min = 111 minutes, or 1.85 hours. From 8:45am plus 1.85 hours = 10:36am
Paulina had 12 other tabulators. She could have had 31,000 ballots fed in within 20 to 30 minutes, yet it took her until 4:45pm. Eight hours!!!
This is by design citizens, she is delaying just like they did in 2020. See 5 posts above for details, photos.
Our TeamWISCONSIN is there, inside and out, while 14 (yes 14) RNC attorneys are sitting in a room watching the news. Not going to the Central Count in Milwaukee. Unbelievable! Gutierrez:
~ Peter Bernegger (https://t.me/PeterBernegger)
Peter Bernegger, [11/6/2024 12:08 AM]
BREAKING: announcement over PA at Milwaukee Central Count it is ok to count mail-in ballots whose envelopes don’t have a witness signature.
This is illegal! Our people obtaining affidavits from Observers now. (see my 10 posts on tabulator seals breaking, above). And:
We sent in Observers for all shifts.
We sent in public records requests for the videos.
We sent in attorneys earlier.
We sent in licensed private investigators, a small army of them.
We sent in a certified auditor.
We sent in a Ret. Military Policeman.
We have embedded election workers. 😎
AND, we just got the RNC attorneys to stop eating donuts and do something.
~ Peter Bernegger (https://t.me/PeterBernegger)
Peter Bernegger, [11/5/2024 8:29 PM]
Seals broken on ALL 13 tabulators at Milwaukee Center Count! Claim: door was not closed properly, yeah right…on all 13 tabulators?
HUGE questions abound: Jenna Rae of TMJ4 News said they began counting mail-in ballots at 8:45am. What? State law permits ballot processing to begin at 7am. Second source said they began at 8:39am.
What is going on Paulina Gutierrez? She is the city election clerk, and she is a disaster! #Milwaukee What say you Mayor Cavalier Johnson?
TMJ4 News says from 8:45am until 4:45pm they only ran 31,000 through the 13 tabulators. What the heck?
They have many high speed tabulators, the DS950 model runs 280 ballots per minute (and yes have to account for feeding in times, etc., but still).
31,000 divided by 280/min = 111 minutes, or 1.85 hours. From 8:45am plus 1.85 hours = 10:36am
Paulina had 12 other tabulators. She could have had 31,000 ballots fed in within 20 to 30 minutes, yet it took her until 4:45pm. Eight hours!!!
This is by design citizens, she is delaying just like they did in 2020. See 5 posts above for details, photos.
Our TeamWISCONSIN is there, inside and out, while 14 (yes 14) RNC attorneys are sitting in a room watching the news. Not going to the Central Count in Milwaukee. Unbelievable! Gutierrez:
~ Peter Bernegger (https://t.me/PeterBernegger)
Peter Bernegger, [11/6/2024 12:08 AM]
BREAKING: announcement over PA at Milwaukee Central Count it is ok to count mail-in ballots whose envelopes don’t have a witness signature.
This is illegal! Our people obtaining affidavits from Observers now. (see my 10 posts on tabulator seals breaking, above). And:
We sent in Observers for all shifts.
We sent in public records requests for the videos.
We sent in attorneys earlier.
We sent in licensed private investigators, a small army of them.
We sent in a certified auditor.
We sent in a Ret. Military Policeman.
We have embedded election workers. 😎
AND, we just got the RNC attorneys to stop eating donuts and do something.
USA CN Third Party re publication 11/7/24 from Peter Bernegger’s Telegram account, https://t.me/PeterBernegger
David Clements, [11/6/2024 1:09 PM]
At least one race is not over just yet: US Senatorial candidate Eric Hovde was up….but now losing. Looks like due to absentee mail-in ballots. He is running against Tammy Baldwin.
Over 95% reported – 5mins ago
Baldwin 1,662,311
Hovde 1,635,204 (27,107 less)
Anderson 42,133
Other 28,580
Announcement: we have a lawsuit against the Wisconsin Election Commission and the City of Milwaukee Election Commission challenging ~150,000 absentee ballot requests.
Last time I checked 150,000 is more than 27,107.
Also, we have Baldwin for massive Smurfing, i.e. criminal money laundering in the millions. She cheated, she committed election fraud.
How about helping us out here and everyone get this message to Hovde?
And word from the inside of Milwaukee count: the liberal election workers were terrified, terrified to bring in fraudulent ballots. In 2020 there were ~170,000 absentee mail-in ballots, last night ~108,325.
Roughly 64,000 fraudulent ballots were inserted at Milwaukee Central Count in 2020, they were terrified to try and do it again. Thanks to all you Patriots, we stopped them.
~ Peter Bernegger (https://t.me/PeterBernegger)
